Not so long ago, Las Vegas was transformed from a hideout for outcasts and outlaws into the go-to place for live events featuring
A-list entertainers and all sorts of affordable, family-oriented attractions and amusements. That transformation was a direct result of a phenomenally
successful marketing slogan that has withstood the test of time: ‘
What Happens in Vegas, Stays in Vegas‘. Las Vegas also offers plenty of opportunities for competitive types to play games-of-skill (
e.g., billiards, darts, golf, tennis), and for risk takers to place wagers on their skills, as well as games-of-chance (
e.g., cards, craps, roulette, slots), hopefully,
without taking a bath.
The Mob Museum (a stone’s throw from the Downtown Grand Hotel in Las Vegas) suggests that the saying ‘
to take a bath‘ was first used in gambling circles during the 1920s to describe the ‘
losing end of a financial investment‘-the image of becoming clean in a bath is a play on an older idiom ‘
to be cleaned out’, which means being ‘
divested of all one’s money‘. The English noun
bathos (derived from the Greek word for ‘
depth‘), however, was first used in 1727 by the poet, translator and satirist
Alexander Pope as a new term for literary criticisms-it describes either an abrupt and often ludicrous transition from elevated to ordinary ideas (a form of anticlimax) or a pretentious sentimentality intended to demonstrate
pathos (derived from the Greek word for ‘
suffering‘). While the words
bathos and
pathos are plainly related in meaning and sound, the terms are not readily interchangeable.
Pathos is a feeling of pity, compassion or tenderness towards a story’s hero (or an admired character) who falls victim to some disastrous event or dies.
Pathetic, the adjective form of
pathos, describes feeling sorry for a sad, weak or helpless person or situation.
Bathos is either
insincere pathos or a descent from the sublime to the ridiculous.
Bathetic, the adjective form of
bathos, almost always has a negative connotation.
Do you believe most gamblers win, break even or get cleaned out? Do you think that CPB/PF recently terminated and replaced Independent DSD Partners with its own corporate employees in St. Louis, MO and San Antonio, TX to ensure that those DSD owners received reasonable returns on their substantial investments of capital and sweat equity simply a few years early – or is it more likely that CPB/PF was just looking to give them a bath? Do you find the recent claims by CPB/PF executives that they highly value the small business owners of PF’s DSD network to be
BATHETIC OR PATHETIC?